Excuse me, but could you please cite the study that shows that a woman, with the exact same experience, and in exactly the same work environment, makes $0.75 for every $1.00 her male co-worker makes? Or, could you please cite the study that shows a 25% difference in the salaries of comparably educated and single (no
spouse or kids) men and women?
If the point is that the gap is caused by discrimination against women, the statistics must be carefully examined. If a man and woman with equal qualifications and experience get paid differently, that may be due to discrimination. I’d venture a guess (admittedly, I cite no studies) that almost always in cases where qualifications and experience are equal, the pay will be the same. To do otherwise is to invite lawsuits.
It’s misleading to just take some aggregate numbers and conclude that pay is unfair. I suppose there are more women in low paying jobs, which if you just look at aggregate numbers will drag down the average. Waitressing, working as a school bus driver, that kind of job, tend to be done more by women, often by choice.
Should a part-time job pay as much as a full-time one? Should a waitress in a café in a small town make as much as a senior manager in a large corporation? Nurse? Architect? I am not convinced that discrimination against women has resulted in a pay gap.
3 comments:
There's a decent overview with plenty of references at:
http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/CEA/html/gendergap.html
It's from 1998, but addresses factors you mention, and contains the 75% gender gap data.
As for your question "Should a waitress in a café in a small town make as much as a senior manager in a large corporation?" - No. Does this have anything to do with the issue? Also no.
My point was that lumping in stats from low paying jobs where women tend to cluster distorts a true analysis of whether women suffer from pay discrimination. If the view is that women should make as much men on a macro scale, then the waitressing jobs would have to pay much more. Viewed on a micro scale, comparing job to job and factoring in experience, I think there is little pay discrimination. However, I have not yet looked over the data you linked to, so once I do I'll revisit the issue.
Sorry, Alan, but 75c is a reasonable approximation of the earning potential of a childless female in today's society. I post about it here.
It's been too well documented to be questioned at this point. It is, however, impossible to bring up a case against this discrimination without the woman receiving severe future repurcusions and labelling. I fully expect that this number will stay around 77c for a number of years, or at least until feminists start taking over CEO jobs, which will cause an overswing of the pendulum, but may eventually result in an earning equality.
BB
Post a Comment