Cramer blames the Blues

There's a reason I don't link to Cramer, and this typifies it. (Link is to HBO post, which links to the Cramer drivel.) Cramer says you can tell you've upset an Idaho liberal

When you find that someone has subscribed you to email lists for repulsive gay pornography.


I suppose that this could be just random spam, but it appears that someone signed me up for this--and that sounds like the kind of stunt that I have learned to expect from the degenerates who represent the Idaho Democratic Party in the blogosphere.

So, Cramer admits it might be random spam, but instead just decides it's because we blue bloggers are "degenerates." First, nice name calling, Cramer. Second, yeah, that's right, insult folks even though you're unsure whether they did the act you're insulting them for. Third, does the term "hasty generalization" mean anything to you? All blue bloggers are degenerates, eh?Although there are more blue bloggers than red ones in Idaho, we Idaho blues would fit comfortably in a Chevy Subdivision, meaning that you've called me, Julie, MG, Chris, TVA, and others, degenerates. Please, explain how I am, or any of the others are, a degenerate. Fifth Fourth, any evidence you'd care to share about what caused you to learn to expect such treatment?

Sorry, but this post just seems to be a petulant, thoughtless, drive-by shooting.

I do appreciate him using the correct name for the Democratic Party.

Update: Changed the title that called Cramer a wanker. Since I'm criticizing him for name calling, I shouldn't be doing it. Also, got lost in my numbering, now fixed.